Page 1 of 1
Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:19 pm
by Slednx
Should the sex workers significant other be allowed to "hang out" at her place of employment while she is on shift?
Hell no is my answer! Too much of a distraction to the lady who is there to make money for herself and the company from paying clients.
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:24 pm
by SixT9er
I wouldn’t think it would be a very good idea. That being said if they have the type of relationship where they can handle it then it shouldn’t be a problem but I doubt very many have that kind of relationship.
I know if I knew the Ladies husband/boyfriend were in the house watching I’d steer clear of the Lady
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:20 am
by ChubbyChaser
I'm going with Hell No as well. Seems like a very bad idea with no upside.
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 6:58 am
by MrTShirt
If you have been watching over the years you would know one SW had her husband employed as a maintenance worker.
You would also know more than one owner / manager had "special benefits" with one or more SW.
Did it work? Let's hear from the a) owners/managers, b) the SW, c) the other SWs and d) the customers.
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 11:32 am
by billwh
Slednx link wrote:
Should the sex workers significant other be allowed to "hang out" at her place of employment while she is on shift?
Hell no is my answer! Too much of a distraction to the lady who is there to make money for herself and the company from paying clients.
I'm trying to imagine what it would be like to feel no possessiveness at all, to the point where I could watch my significant other flirting with some guy and then taking him back to her room for sex, and feel nothing but amusement.
That would be great! To be free of possessiveness and jealousy, to take nothing personally or seriously. To me that would be heaven.
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:54 pm
by wayne208
If He wants To hang around that Much .. I would do His wife in front of him . In about 10 different ways . Then I would Charge Him 100 Bucks for Watching .. ???
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 6:34 am
by georoc01
Does you'r S.O. hang out at your place of employment while you are working? Unless they work there as well and have a reason to be there, I'm not sure why they would?
That said, I know one former monger who used a free party to party with his wife. He liked the idea of the owner paying his wife while he was having sex with her. No word if a condom was used or not.
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 9:03 am
by adventurer
I trust the women to know their relationship and make this call.
One SW I know has a husband work as staff. Both are swingers and have swing in separate rooms or alone. If you are comfortable with that I'm sure the my comfortable with SW.
I could see someone not liking a jerk being disrespectful or doing thing without consent. A gentleman would say something even if not his spouse. Most seasoned SW know how to diffuse on own, but it's good to have backup when needed, even from patrons. I would say something or offer an out to get away from a conversation with a jerk
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 9:58 am
by Slednx
Like most threads I start, it is based on actual experience. In this case I was at the strip club in the cul-de-sac watching the ladies dance. After a particular ladies set, I kindly asked her when she got a chance, I'd like some private dances. "Sure, no problem", she replied. She then sits at the end of bar and starts talking to her lesbian partner. Fifteen minutes goes by and I finally go and interrupt so I can get my dances. She obliges. I enjoy my time and after a few dances, ask her to go to the VIP lounge. She agrees, then proceeds to go let her "partner" know. I sit there chubbed up waiting.......and waiting. Finally, I said fuck it and leave.
Don't know what the delay was about but it centered around her and her lesbian partner, why should I have to be there to compete with her significant other? I shouldn't , I was the one with a wallet full of hundreds and the one willing to pay for her company.
Don't know what the policy there is but hopefully Kristopher reads this.
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:27 pm
by adventurer
I think this is example of professional vs personal relationship. At work you would be expected to perform your professional duties and not let things block you form work
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:13 pm
by billwh
adventurer link wrote:
I think this is example of professional vs personal relationship. At work you would be expected to perform your professional duties and not let things block you form work
That's the way it SHOULD be.
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:48 pm
by SixT9er
Slednx link wrote:
Like most threads I start, it is based on actual experience. In this case I was at the strip club in the cul-de-sac watching the ladies dance. After a particular ladies set, I kindly asked her when she got a chance, I'd like some private dances. "Sure, no problem", she replied. She then sits at the end of bar and starts talking to her lesbian partner. Fifteen minutes goes by and I finally go and interrupt so I can get my dances. She obliges. I enjoy my time and after a few dances, ask her to go to the VIP lounge. She agrees, then proceeds to go let her "partner" know. I sit there chubbed up waiting.......and waiting. Finally, I said fuck it and leave.
Don't know what the delay was about but it centered around her and her lesbian partner, why should I have to be there to compete with her significant other? I shouldn't , I was the one with a wallet full of hundreds and the one willing to pay for her company.
Don't know what the policy there is but hopefully Kristopher reads this.
Why were you in the strip club to begin with?
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:51 am
by Slednx
Because I was in the cul-de-sac partying and because the bumble bee ate all the honey.
Re: Should the SW significant other be allowed at her place of employment?
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 2:51 pm
by Lee
As a general full time hang-out, no. Allowed though? Well sure. Wouldn't Your SigOther be 'allowed' to come by Your office, job site, etc. and say Hi or wait for You to finish something up and go to lunch together or something? So if Your SigOther is a SW and She is finishing up a party or bar visit, no big deal, just wait on Her. Not gonna use the quote button though I did like what billwh was saying, that is, to be free of jealousy and possessiveness to the point that it is enjoyable and/or amusing to know what She is doing. After all if the 2 hearts are not in it then they aren't 'significant others' to each other anyway. Using/enjoying the vagina or penis with people isn't the same as tampering with the heart.