Nolittlegirl's Bait and Switch Job Scheme

[rachelvarga]

I looked at the nolittle girl site and they are feeding this whole "we'll help girls transition" to the public to counter the girls position that and they will lose their jobs.

That's a total load of crap.
You can't put prostitute on your resume.
There is no way they can get any girl a job making what she makes now.

Show everyone your plan.
Show me industries they will have to work in. Fast food? Waitressing? Maybe cleaning your church's toilets.
Show everyone the companies willing to hire former prostitutes.
Show me a 6 figure job that girls can get without any experience.

This is total bullshit. If you are going to transition them then pay needs to be the same.


They say they will HELP the girls which means no guarantee.

So your going to ruin someone's life so you can feel good about yourself?

Good luck

[SixT9er]

But they are saving you!


There’s no way you could possibly choose to be a Legal Courtesan! You are being coerced and forced to make that 6 figure income against your will!!!! ???

[Lee]

                                                              That bunch of people
                                                                        is a:

                                                            WOLF IN SHEEPS' CLOTHING

                                                             
Even people who don't participate in Courtesanship should see the benefits of State regulation, medical oversight, and taxes paid. I do my best not to speak ill of others, and, this particular vile group of ignorant, special interest group hypocrites are a threat to civility, decency, humanity, and fundamental respect of persons. (I phrased this politely because I didn't want to 'turn the stomach' of the good people who show up here)

[wayne208]

Rachel You know I would Hire You if I could ..    But I do not own a Company 

[SexyLexieJames]

They fail to take into account the large number of us with Bachelor, Masters and Doctorate degrees that they couldn't possibly have anything to offer. I may have skills and a degree outside of this, but Rachel is right, I can't put prostitute on my resume to explain the 2 year gap in employment![/size]

[rachelvarga]

They fail to take into account the large number of us with Bachelor, Masters and Doctorate degrees that they couldn't possibly have anything to offer. I may have skills and a degree outside of this, but Rachel is right, I can't put prostitute on my resume to explain the 2 year gap in employment![/size]

Exactly! They don't care about us. It's just about feeling good because they are on a crusade. If they are so worried about women then why aren't they trying to do something about women all over the world that are truly oppressed?

[CatrinaCosta]

I think it very interesting that they pretend to care about woman as an "extremely vulnerable segment of our society", yet also plainly repeat in several places that they will help only "after the brothels close". (Not that their "help" is needed or wanted.) Sounds like they are more concerned with closing brothels than about "helping" anyone.[/size]

Like Awaken, they lean on "studies" by Melissa Farley, a reportedly unreliable source:[/size]

• Her prostitution studies have been criticized by sociologist Ronald Weitzer for reported issues with methodology
• Weitzer has also said that Farley's findings are heavily influenced by radical feminist ideology
• Farley has been criticized for accepting significant funding from anti-trafficking organizations
• Farley research assistant Colleen Winn ... said that Farley had fabricated and misrepresented data in elements of reports which Farley had prepared on prostitution in New Zealand. Among Winn's accusations was that Farley's alleged statement that she had evidence that women were entering prostitution at age nine was untrue; the studies she performed did not collect any data indicating this
• Winn wrote that Farley's study " ... was not ethical, and the impact has done harm to those women and men who took part in it. It is for that reason that I am writing to the psychologists [sic] board of registration in California to lay a formal complaint regarding Melissa. I also believe that Melissa has committed an act of intentional misrepresentation of fact."

Canadian judge Susan Himel wrote:

• I found the evidence of Dr. Melissa Farley to be problematic. Although Dr. Farley has conducted a great deal of research on prostitution, her advocacy appears to have permeated her opinions. For example, Dr. Farley's unqualified assertion in her affidavit that prostitution is inherently violent appears to contradict her own findings that prostitutes who work from indoor locations generally experience less violence. Furthermore, in her affidavit, she failed to qualify her opinion regarding the causal relationship between post- traumatic stress disorder and prostitution, namely, that it could be caused by events unrelated to prostitution.
• Dr. Farley's choice of language is at times inflammatory and detracts from her conclusions. For example, comments such as "prostitution is to the community what incest is to the family" and "just as pedophiles justify sexual assault of children . . . . men who use prostitutes develop elaborate cognitive schemes to justify purchase and use of women" make her opinions less persuasive.
• Dr. Farley stated during cross-examination that some of her opinions on prostitution were formed prior to her research, including "that prostitution is a terrible harm to women, that prostitution is abusive in its very nature, and that prostitution amounts to men paying a woman for the right to rape her".
• Accordingly, for these reasons, I assign less weight to Dr. Farley's evidence.

(citations from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Farley)[/size]

[MrTShirt]

We have a political movement, like other political movements.
Their game plan:  Create a desired outcome and then create lies to see what sticks.  If the current lies don't stick, create more lies.
The problem is many people will believe the lies and not bother to check.
If prostitution were to be outlawed, these people would all disappear, along with their "programs".

[dbldblu51]

We have a political movement, like other political movements.
Their game plan:  Create a desired outcome and then create lies to see what sticks.  If the current lies don't stick, create more lies.
The problem is many people will believe the lies and not bother to check.
If prostitution were to be outlawed, these people would all disappear, along with their "programs".

I agree with the above.

[TC]

Prostitution is the opposite of "paying for the right to rape". It's paying for consent. Sometimes exorbitant amounts of money for consent, without which no sex is offered by the lady. Melissa Farley has issues. I know feminist is a dirty word to some people...not me, I am one, and I like dirty words anyway so who cares. These fanatics need to stop abusing their power and mind their fucking business, or do a better job on the streets and get trafficked women addiction treatment, counseling, new work, meds etc. Go fight to get funding to help trafficked women who people don't want to pay tax money to help because they're just you know whats and they "made a choice to spread their legs". Help THOSE little girls.


But that's HARD so instead crack down on brothels where the aftermath will cost society no actual effort. #endrant

[dyanadyamonds]

I looked at the nolittle girl site and they are feeding this whole "we'll help girls transition" to the public to counter the girls position that and they will lose their jobs.

That's a total load of crap.
You can't put prostitute on your resume.
There is no way they can get any girl a job making what she makes now.

Show everyone your plan.
Show me industries they will have to work in. Fast food? Waitressing? Maybe cleaning your church's toilets.
Show everyone the companies willing to hire former prostitutes.
Show me a 6 figure job that girls can get without any experience.

This is total bullshit. If you are going to transition them then pay needs to be the same.


They say they will HELP the girls which means no guarantee.

So your going to ruin someone's life so you can feel good about yourself?

Good luck
[/quote




They contacted me to do an interview about my life. They assumed Dennis Hof had somehow magically forced ced me into this life. I got on to that woman! I told her let me tell you something, In no way shape or form did Dennis Hof EVER have a hand in my starting this journey. I wasn't nt anywhere near the state of Nevada when I was turned out, Dennis and I will always have our differences but I am not allowing this group to hear what they want to hear. My decisions have been mine and mine alone.I respect Dennis. They need to get there facts straight!!!! It is non sense.
Xoxo,
Dyana Dyamonds

[isurfer]

Maybe their transition plan will be to "train" the former prostitutes into becoming Uber, Lyft, or taxi cab drivers with not much training involved. To protect the ladies when driving for fares they might have to invest in some self defense and small firearms training, but I think some working girls are already trained in those things.

[Rand McNally]

Maybe their transition plan will be to "train" the former prostitutes into becoming Uber, Lyft, or taxi cab drivers ...

I could run Uber out of business.  "McNallyCar....our drivers guarantee every ride will have a happy ending."[/size]

As for the original posters remark about do-gooders ruining others lives to make themselves feel good, that's exactly what being a do-gooder is about.[/size]

[rachelvarga]

I think it very interesting that they pretend to care about woman as an "extremely vulnerable segment of our society", yet also plainly repeat in several places that they will help only "after the brothels close". (Not that their "help" is needed or wanted.) Sounds like they are more concerned with closing brothels than about "helping" anyone.[/size]

Like Awaken, they lean on "studies" by Melissa Farley, a reportedly unreliable source:[/size]

• Her prostitution studies have been criticized by sociologist Ronald Weitzer for reported issues with methodology
• Weitzer has also said that Farley's findings are heavily influenced by radical feminist ideology
• Farley has been criticized for accepting significant funding from anti-trafficking organizations
• Farley research assistant Colleen Winn ... said that Farley had fabricated and misrepresented data in elements of reports which Farley had prepared on prostitution in New Zealand. Among Winn's accusations was that Farley's alleged statement that she had evidence that women were entering prostitution at age nine was untrue; the studies she performed did not collect any data indicating this
• Winn wrote that Farley's study " ... was not ethical, and the impact has done harm to those women and men who took part in it. It is for that reason that I am writing to the psychologists [sic] board of registration in California to lay a formal complaint regarding Melissa. I also believe that Melissa has committed an act of intentional misrepresentation of fact."

Canadian judge Susan Himel wrote:

• I found the evidence of Dr. Melissa Farley to be problematic. Although Dr. Farley has conducted a great deal of research on prostitution, her advocacy appears to have permeated her opinions. For example, Dr. Farley's unqualified assertion in her affidavit that prostitution is inherently violent appears to contradict her own findings that prostitutes who work from indoor locations generally experience less violence. Furthermore, in her affidavit, she failed to qualify her opinion regarding the causal relationship between post- traumatic stress disorder and prostitution, namely, that it could be caused by events unrelated to prostitution.
• Dr. Farley's choice of language is at times inflammatory and detracts from her conclusions. For example, comments such as "prostitution is to the community what incest is to the family" and "just as pedophiles justify sexual assault of children . . . . men who use prostitutes develop elaborate cognitive schemes to justify purchase and use of women" make her opinions less persuasive.
• Dr. Farley stated during cross-examination that some of her opinions on prostitution were formed prior to her research, including "that prostitution is a terrible harm to women, that prostitution is abusive in its very nature, and that prostitution amounts to men paying a woman for the right to rape her".
• Accordingly, for these reasons, I assign less weight to Dr. Farley's evidence.

(citations from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Farley)[/size]

Rachel Varga stated,  "She's a dumbass and needs to get laid."

[ColtsFan]

I think it very interesting that they pretend to care about woman as an "extremely vulnerable segment of our society", yet also plainly repeat in several places that they will help only "after the brothels close". (Not that their "help" is needed or wanted.) Sounds like they are more concerned with closing brothels than about "helping" anyone.[/size]

Like Awaken, they lean on "studies" by Melissa Farley, a reportedly unreliable source:[/size]

• Her prostitution studies have been criticized by sociologist Ronald Weitzer for reported issues with methodology
• Weitzer has also said that Farley's findings are heavily influenced by radical feminist ideology
• Farley has been criticized for accepting significant funding from anti-trafficking organizations
• Farley research assistant Colleen Winn ... said that Farley had fabricated and misrepresented data in elements of reports which Farley had prepared on prostitution in New Zealand. Among Winn's accusations was that Farley's alleged statement that she had evidence that women were entering prostitution at age nine was untrue; the studies she performed did not collect any data indicating this
• Winn wrote that Farley's study " ... was not ethical, and the impact has done harm to those women and men who took part in it. It is for that reason that I am writing to the psychologists [sic] board of registration in California to lay a formal complaint regarding Melissa. I also believe that Melissa has committed an act of intentional misrepresentation of fact."

Canadian judge Susan Himel wrote:

• I found the evidence of Dr. Melissa Farley to be problematic. Although Dr. Farley has conducted a great deal of research on prostitution, her advocacy appears to have permeated her opinions. For example, Dr. Farley's unqualified assertion in her affidavit that prostitution is inherently violent appears to contradict her own findings that prostitutes who work from indoor locations generally experience less violence. Furthermore, in her affidavit, she failed to qualify her opinion regarding the causal relationship between post- traumatic stress disorder and prostitution, namely, that it could be caused by events unrelated to prostitution.
• Dr. Farley's choice of language is at times inflammatory and detracts from her conclusions. For example, comments such as "prostitution is to the community what incest is to the family" and "just as pedophiles justify sexual assault of children . . . . men who use prostitutes develop elaborate cognitive schemes to justify purchase and use of women" make her opinions less persuasive.
• Dr. Farley stated during cross-examination that some of her opinions on prostitution were formed prior to her research, including "that prostitution is a terrible harm to women, that prostitution is abusive in its very nature, and that prostitution amounts to men paying a woman for the right to rape her".
• Accordingly, for these reasons, I assign less weight to Dr. Farley's evidence.

(citations from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Farley)[/size]

None of this should be a surprise.  The VAST majority of sociology research is complete bullshit.  There's a reason sociology departments are viewed as jokes by other branches of science.