Page 1 of 1
WHO Reverse Position On Lockdown
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 5:49 am
by MrTShirt
https://pandemic.internationalsos.com/r ... ct-11-2020
WHO finally agrees with President Trump, but 6 months late.
Maybe Gov. Sisolak will get the message.
Re: WHO Reverse Position On Lockdown
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:30 am
by georoc01
Yes, the lockdown failed in this country. Mainly because there was no commitment behind it. A hard lockdown for 4 weeks would be very effective at slowing the spread of the virus, but we would never do that in this country. And a long term partial lockdown has negative consequences as pointed out by the WHO.
So now we depend on masks to slow the spread.
What we know now is that large indoor gatherings, especially without masks create superspreading events.
So the question is can you safely open the brothels and avoid the indoor gatherings?
Keeping the parlors closed and going to appointment or virtual selection of ladies seems like the way to avoid the gathering.
Obviously testing should be part of the process as well. But who gets tested an how often? That's the difficult question to answer.
Re: WHO Reverse Position On Lockdown
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 6:31 am
by rachelvarga
The problem is a balance between what is good for one as opposed to many. There has to be a balance but people think everything they do is a right.
You don't have the right to drive a car. That is a privilege. It is not alienable or inalienable. It just isn't.
I'm sure I'm going to be told I am not American enough by Mr. America.
Rachel Varga
onlyfans.com/rachelvarga
rachelbomb.com
twitter.com/rachelbombx
Re: WHO Reverse Position On Lockdown
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 1:28 pm
by G
Who? Who needs them? Multiple measures used instead of an one size approach for all? Why are we hearing about this now?