Page 1 of 1
Response to Q
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2020 1:52 pm
by rachelvarga
http://sex-in-nevada.net/smforum/index.php?topic=36821.msg417718#new
Stick an olive branch up my ass? That's pretty mean.
Q, What we say here to each other on these boards is not real. You don't really know me and I don't really know you. So we can fight all day and night and post each other's emails and make each other look like the evilest piece of shit on the planet but when we turn off the computer it doesn't matter because Q and RachelVarga just exist here. We all just exist here in this made-up brothel world and no one really cares.
LPIN survives on anonymity. Without that it all falls apart. I think we can agree on that. We all value our privacy. That's why Pat was excommunicated. He violated the most basic rule of all. Never do anything that can affect someone's life outside of the brothel community.
Q, I don't care about anything that has happened between us except for one thing. Everything else is just fighting between two personalities that refuse to bend. No different than Twitter or Reddit. We can post and argue but it will not change anyone's minds. No one is going to think, "Wow they are right, I'm going to the other board." Most people probably think we are being immature and need to grow up. They are probably right.
So I will just say what I do care about.
When you talked to Jennifer and tried to get me fired you went into my personal life. I could have lost everything. My house and all that I worked for. I would have lost the means to save for my retirement and take care of people that depend on me. You were so mad that you tried to ruin my life. Think about that. You went outside of LPIN and anyone else would be ostracized for that kind of thing. If you did not run that board you would be in the same boat as Pat. It's not just about outing people, it's about not breaking that wall of privacy or interfering in each other's lives.
I have said some mean stuff but Q, but I never did that to you. I didn't tell your work or church that you run a prostitution board or message every single person on your Facebook telling them. I never did anything to hurt you outside of LPIN. I would never do anything outside of this little world to you or anyone.
I just wanted to get that off my chest.
Rachel
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2020 7:29 pm
by rachelvarga
2020 was a bad year for everyone. I plan for 2021 to be a good year. I already changed my hosts file so that I myself can never see the other forum and I have posted exactly how I feel. Please do not send me any links. I will not read them. I do not care what he posts because it doesn't affect me anymore. He showed his hand and believes everyone is like him but I have to believe that the people in this community are above his type of behavior.
Any man that tells a woman to stick it up her ass is a man of low moral character. Q hates women. For whatever reason he has been like this as far back I could find in the cookiemonster posts when I first was on the site. He looks down on women and has no respect for them. His depravity has no end and we now see the one undeniable truth. There is no cookie in the monster. It's just all monster. Chivalry will never visit his door and in his last days, he will be an old man full of hate for a world that he could not understand or accept.
You have no power over me or my life. You can't hurt me anymore Q.
http://sex-in-nevada.net/smforum/index.php?topic=36762.0
http://forum.mustangranchbrothel.com/index.php?topic=3698.msg21207#msg21207
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:21 am
by rachelvarga
I'm going to lock this because it's time to shut this book and throw it in the trash. I'll sticky it for a little while longer. Thank you for all the pm's.
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 10:30 am
by rachelvarga
Rachel Varga link wrote:
I'm going to unlock and unsticky this because then it will flow off of the front page eventually. Thank you for all the messages.
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 2:10 pm
by Slednx
Rachel Varga link wrote:
For whatever reason he has been like this as far back I could find in the cookiemonster posts when I first was on the site. He looks down on women and has no respect for them. His depravity has no end and we now see the one undeniable truth. There is no cookie in the monster. It's just all monster.
Rachel, if you want a good laugh, you should check out the thread "helping newbies" on SIN. In it, you have Cookiemonster aka "Q" posting about his trip to the Bunnyranch. Where he keeps getting price walked by the ladies, then after it, returning to the parlor and asking for Dennis. Dennis to help poor pathetic Cookie maybe score a party with a lady. Problem was Dennis wasn't there. Despite all these years and all his talk, truth was he could not negotiate himself a party with one of the fine ladies and he admits it for all to see how pathetic he really is.
I would post a link to the thread and his post but it seems the SIN site has disappeared. Maybe he made it private? Didn't he just say he would never do that...what a hypocrite!
Response to Q
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 8:16 pm
by firefighter
I read Rachel Varga's post concerning the probable DoS attack, so Q's criticism is invalid. It was proper for an administrator to analyze the situation before reporting it on the open board. Furthermore, there's no requirement for an administrator to completely explain a service interruption. The awards website service was interrupted once due to excessive traffic created by business Huawei Clouds, but our server is limited too.
Q owned the two boards given him free by Interested bystander, and said that he would continue operation as IB had done. However, Q subsequently attempted to control the awards even though he refused to be a registered voter or committee member. IB was the previous board owner and committee advisor after leaving the awards committee but allowed the awards committee to function independently without intervention to control.
Q advised the committee to implement a "Good Standard" for COY eligibility, because he wanted to disqualify Rachel Varga. The awards committee had approved and posted the 2016 contest rules, so we respectfully and unanimously refused. The only rule concerning COY eligibility is Courtesans must have worked at least one day in a LPIN brothel during the contest year. Registered Voters elect the COY and the committee doesn't limit their choices.
Therefore, Q initiated his mudslinging campaign against Rachel Varga during the 2016 COY contest. This action was totally unprofessional since it was policy for administrators and moderators to refrain from attempting to coerce registered voters on candidate selection. This practice of being unbiased was followed by board members too since Courtesans were customarily provided the courtesy to compete on an equal basis.
I know Rachel Varga didn't make threats of bodily harm against Ovr-da-hill. Furthermore, Q told the awards committee that Rachel made posts on the other board that had to be edited due to content, but those posts looked acceptable to us considering the type of forum. Compared to Q's recent elaboration on "Sport Fucking" Rachel's posts were mild. However, Q has a personal vendetta against Rachel Varga and he's vindictive and relentless.
ECE registered 25 handles during the 2014 contest, so the private Duck board may have attempted a countermeasure scheme. However, both of those actions were attempts to control the contest and it had devastating effects. Q attempted to control the 2016 contest with his mudslinging campaign and it further tarnished the awards. Q's recent post on the other board is simply a rehashing of the unfounded accusations made during the 2016 COY contest to apparently destroy Rachel Varga's equal opportunity and freedom to compete for ATF COY.
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:19 am
by Cobia
Great post Firefighter !
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2021 7:26 am
by dyanadyamonds
Smh
Response to Q
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2021 9:50 am
by firefighter
Rachel Varga is an affectionate woman of impeccable character who exhibits a congenial personality. She is the most honest person I know, and I’m proud to call her my friend. Furthermore, I have never known her to lie; rather, she is completely sincere and forthright.
Conversely, Q is both a narcissistic and pathological liar, and demented hatemonger who succumbs to delusions of grandeur. Unfortunately becoming administrator of a forum that he has turned into a smut board has resulted in the Napoleon complex; Q is not short but his behavior fits the definition characterized by overly-aggressive and domineering social behavior and compulsive lying.
It’s rumored that Q crashed a rental car and was arrested for DUI on one of his brothel trips, so it’s probable he was intoxicated when he posted the lies about Rachel Varga.
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2021 11:03 am
by Cobia
firefighter link wrote:
Rachel Varga is an affectionate woman of impeccable character who exhibits a congenial personality. She is the most honest person I know, and I’m proud to call her my friend. Furthermore, I have never known her to lie; rather, she is completely sincere and forthright.
Conversely, Q is both a narcissistic and pathological liar, and demented hatemonger who succumbs to delusions of grandeur. Unfortunately becoming administrator of a forum that he has turned into a smut board has resulted in the Napoleon complex; Q is not short but his behavior fits the definition characterized by overly-aggressive and domineering social behavior and compulsive lying.
It’s rumored that Q crashed a rental car and was arrested for DUI on one of his brothel trips, so it’s probable he was intoxicated when he posted the lies about Rachel Varga.
No rumor.
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:23 pm
by Uncle_Duke
One small correction ECE had 41 registered accounts .
Response to Q
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 3:29 am
by firefighter
Uncle_Duke link wrote:
One small correction ECE had 41 registered accounts .
It's true that ECE registered at least 41 member handles on the other board, but only 25 were confirmed registered voters. There were a couple of others that we were never able to attribute to ECE though. Rick James believed that registered board member Could_Care_Less was actually ECE too.
Re: Response to Q
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 11:43 am
by rachelvarga
People can post anything they want but the truth is none of it has weight because it can't be verifie as authentic in this day and age. I'm not going to bother with any more of this. This hate toward me has turned into an obsession.
When a woman doesn't play ball or fights back then she is called a crazy bitch. I am not crazy, and I am not a narciccist. Not one single psychiatrist would label me that or even close. I think that everyone knows I'm not.
2021 is here and Q's obsession with me has given me pause to worry about what will he do if he continues to escalate his hatred. Should I be worried for my security when I'm at work? I don't bargain or let obsessive stalker personalities control me.
Hopefully he can work on his anger issues with a professional and find some peace within the chaos inside of him.
I am moving forward and don't want our group tarnished by him anymore.
Thank you all.
Rachel Varga
onlyfans.com/rachelvarga
rachelbomb.com
twitter.com/rachelbombx